Thriving or Burning Out? AI and Smart Cities Shape Serial Entrepreneurs’ Work-Life Balance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68903/iilmr.v01i01.05Keywords:
Serial entrepreneurs, Artificial intelligence, Smart cities, WLB, Job Demands–Resources Model, Entrepreneurial resilienceAbstract
In Dubai’s hyper-connected smart-city landscape—where innovation moves at algorithmic speed serial entrepreneurs find themselves thriving and burning out at the same time. This study examines how these entrepreneurs navigate the paradoxical effects of artificial intelligence (AI) and smart-city infrastructures on their work–life balance (WLB). Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 20 multi-venture founders, the analysis applies template analysis and extends the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) Model to reveal how AI-enabled tools function simultaneously as job resources enhancing efficiency, decision accuracy, and opportunity recognition and as job demands that intensify constant connectivity, cognitive overload, and emotional strain. Findings show that smart-city infrastructures accelerate entrepreneurial tempo, blur personal–professional boundaries, and heighten technological dependency, producing distinct patterns of overload not captured in traditional entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurs respond through selective technology adoption, task delegation, boundary-setting, and continuous learning, yet these adaptive strategies cannot fully compensate for ecosystem-level gaps in psychosocial and policy support. The study advances theory by conceptualizing AI as a resource demand hybrid within entrepreneurial labour and by positioning resilience as an emergent socio-technical practice. Practically, it calls for human-centred smart-city governance that integrates wellness, mentorship, and digital-boundary programs. Overall, the findings demonstrate that sustaining entrepreneurship in AI-intensive urban environments requires aligning technological innovation with human well-being.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, A. E., Ucbasaran, D., Cacciotti, G., & Williams, T. A. (2022). Integrating psychological resilience, stress, and coping in entrepreneurship: A critical review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 497–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211046542
Audretsch, D. B., & Kariv, D. (2025). Emotional resources and knowledge management: A gender perspective on human-centric innovation amidst crises. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-02-2024-0235
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job Demands–Resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
Caputo, A., Pizzi, S., Pellegrini, M. M., & Dabić, M. (2021). Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field. Journal of Business Research, 123,489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.053
Cetindamar, D., Lammers, T., & Sick, N. (2020). Understanding the relationship between smart cities and entrepreneurial ecosystems: The case of Sydney. In N. Biloria (Ed.), Data-driven multivalence in the built environment. S.M.A.R.T. Environments (pp. 275–292). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12180-8_15
Corbo, L., Mahassel, S., & Ferraris, A. (2020). Translational mechanisms in business model design: Introducing the continuous validation framework. Management Decision, 58 (9), 2011–2026. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2019-1488
Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2023). Job Demands–Resources theory in times of crises: New propositions. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221135022
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain full copyright of their published work while granting TMR a non-exclusive license (CC-BY-4.0) to publish and disseminate under an open access agreement. Articles are distributed under licenses that permit sharing and adaptation with appropriate attribution.