Socio-Demographic Determinants of Consumer Practices In E-Waste Management

Authors

  • Kartik Dave School of Management, Dr. B.R Ambedkar University, Delhi, India Author
  • Deeksha Dave Environmental Studies, School of Inter Disciplinary and Trans Disciplinary Studies, Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), Maidan Garhi, New Delhi 110068, India Author
  • Meenakshi Mohan Bhardwaj School of Management, Dr. B.R Ambedkar University, Delhi, India. Author
  • Bharti Sharma School of Management, Dr. B.R Ambedkar University, Delhi, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68903/iilmr.v01i01.04

Keywords:

E-waste management, Consumer behaviour, Socio-demographic factors, Socio-economic status, Awareness, Circular economy

Abstract

The growing volume of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) poses significant environmental and public health risks, particularly in countries where informal recycling dominates. Although consumer behaviour is central to improving recovery and recycling, evidence on how socio-demographic and socio-economic factors shape e-waste management (EWM) remains limited at a large, multi-state scale in India. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 5,690 respondents across eight north-western states of India. Data were collected using a structured, theory-based and psychometrically validated questionnaire derived from an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) framework. Socio-demographic and socio-economic determinants of knowledge, awareness and EWM practices were examined using chi-square tests, ANOVA and multivariate regression. Knowledge, awareness and practices differed significantly across education, occupation, income and socio-economic status (SES), but not by gender or marital status. Younger respondents, graduates and professionals showed higher knowledge of e-waste hazards and policies. While 55.5% of respondents demonstrated high knowledge, awareness levels were uneven: financial benefits of EWM were recognised by 68.3% of respondents, whereas only 58.1% were aware of the technical aspects, such as material recovery. SES emerged as a consistent predictor of responsible practices, showing a positive gradient that plateaued at higher SES levels. The study also revealed marked state-level differences, highlighting disparities in public communication and access to formal recycling infrastructure. This study contributes large-scale, multi-state evidence that socio-demographic and socio-economic inequalities, together with regional disparities, strongly shape consumer engagement in EWM. By documenting the specific population groups and states where gaps are largest, the findings offer a practical basis for targeted awareness efforts, incentive-based interventions and improvements in collection systems. These insights can support policy implementation under India’s E-Waste Rules and advance circular economy objectives under SDG 12.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Adzania, F. H., Zakianis, Wulandari, R. A., Ambarsari, R., Fauzia, S., & Aryati, G. P. (2023). Association between socioeconomic and demographic factors with electronic waste generation in Jakarta. Annali di Igiene, 35(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2022.2536

2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

3. Almulhim, A. I. (2022). Household’s awareness and participation in sustainable electronic waste management practices in Saudi Arabia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(4), 101729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101729

4. Awasthi, A. K., Li, J., Koh, L., Ogunseitan, O. A., Zeng, X., & Singh, A. (2018). E-waste management in India: A mini-review. Waste Management & Research, 36(5), 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18767038

5. Bagwan, W. A. (2024). Electronic waste (E-waste) generation and management scenario of India, and ARIMA forecasting of E-waste processing capacity of Maharashtra state till 2030. Waste Management Bulletin, 1(4), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2023.08.002

6. Bazancir, T., & Ok, Y. (2025). A case study of transferring the effect of demographic factors on e-waste recycling to the waste container assignment model. PLOS ONE, 20(8), e0315695. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315695

7. Bhardwaj, L. K., Rath, P., & Tokas, R. (2023). E-waste management in developing countries: Current practices, challenges, disposal, and impact on human health and environment. In E-Waste Management and Sustainable Development (pp. 90–102). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1018-2.ch007

8. Borthakur, A. (2015). Changes in composition of EEE and subsequent impacts on electronic waste. Waste and Resource Management, 168(4), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1680/warm.14.00011

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Socio-Demographic Determinants of Consumer Practices In E-Waste Management. (2026). Transformational Management Review, 1(01), 45-71. https://doi.org/10.68903/iilmr.v01i01.04

Similar Articles

1-10 of 14

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.